Aux Volume correlates to Rig volume btw... doesn't make sense, does it?
Which features would you like to be added next?
-
-
uncheck the Link case
-
Ok, I feel like a noob now Gonna check that out at home, thx again.
-
If you play a profile, send the cc# for tuner and send a pc, you can't end the tuner mode by sending another cc.
So my wish: End the tuner automatically mode by sending a pc!
Next firmware!
-
AUX IN volume independent fom rig-volume please
Aux In (via Return and Alternative In) changes the volumen with the level of the rig-volume (the knob nest to the headphonejack)
If i change the rigs while playing to an aux-in-signal, and the
rigvolumenposition (leds) are different, the aux in volumen changes
parallel to this levelplease make the aux-in-volume lineary dependent to the mastervolumen
thanx -
The Aux In signal is returned to the rig - if it is used as an effects loop, most people would want the level to be connected to Rig Volume. Add a choice in the Master section?
-
AUX IN volume independent fom rig-volume please
Aux In (via Return and Alternative In) changes the volumen with the level of the rig-volume (the knob nest to the headphonejack)
If i change the rigs while playing to an aux-in-signal, and the
rigvolumenposition (leds) are different, the aux in volumen changes
parallel to this levelplease make the aux-in-volume lineary dependent to the mastervolumen
thanxAgreed.
The Aux In signal is returned to the rig - if it is used as an effects loop, most people would want the level to be connected to Rig Volume. Add a choice in the Master section?
This would be fine too.
-
With the new Pitch Shifter and the adjustable tuner function I,m very satisfied.
Thanks Mr. Kemper and team!!!
Now my Kemper is an almost perfect sounding and working instrument and it would be perfectioned only in a few functions to fulfill all my needs.Here is a kind of list of them:
-arpeggiator, slicer
-Performance Mode and/or configurable CC change assigns with two way MIDI communication
-playing Rigs directly from USB or Stick (without import)
-delay, tone, panorama parameters on Pitch Effects
-editor/librarian
-USB MIDI and audio connectivity/communication with computer
-48kHz S/PDIF in/out and slave mode
-insert delay
-ducking parameter in Vibrato effect
-feedback simulator effect
-pedal stomp delay
-full adjustable and storeable parametric EQ on all inputs and outputs
-uppgradable memory which can be attached in the KPAs backing hole for the future features like looper, parallel amps and effects chain...........and Who knows????
MORE IDEEAS, Please????
-tone parameter on every effect, stomp...
-
The possibility to store the settings of the noise gate per rig, while input is locked.
-
Please Guys, let the Kemper Team focus on the only thing that is unique in the gear world: "PROFILING AMPS"
who knows how many competitors are already trying to imitate it.
The KPA is NOT a modeler, the KPA is "THE AMP PROFILER", and IMHO is still far from perfection. Some of you would be happy to see a Roland VG 100 amp profiler, tomorrow in all the shops? and the day after a AXE-AMP-Cloner.And if the problem of the profiles not identical to the original, it is not an imperfection of the KPA, but I just do not know how to make a good profile after hundreds of trials under good technical conditions, it means that…. if I'm not a complete idiot, many like me will have the same "so so" results. What happens if, while the Kemper Team is focused on minor things, a competitor invents a profiling system much simpler, that all guitarists can achieve without being technical sages?
I bought the KPA to simplify my work, instead I lose whole days hoping for the exact copy of my amp setup, to use in my projects, and reuse every time I need it instead of miking again the real amp
... out there are dozens of very good modelers doing everything you ask here in this thread…..but only one Profiler thought for other benefits!
Let it do his job at the best! for what is advertised and for the reason we bought it!I hope my English is understandable
Nice weekend to all of you!
-
My experience:
shit in -> shit out (because I don't have the gear nor knowledge to mic an amp properly). You sure you're not comparing the amp in the room to the profile? I really don't know how someone could really improve the profiling - I don't hear any difference between the mic'ed amp and the profile - but maybe my ears are (luckily) too bad - dunno -
My experience:
shit in -> shit out (because I don't have the gear nor knowledge to mic an amp properly). You sure you're not comparing the amp in the room to the profile? I really don't know how someone could really improve the profiling - I don't hear any difference between the mic'ed amp and the profile - but maybe my ears are (luckily) too bad - dunno-My second KPA also defective? do not think so.
-My ears devastated? perhaps
-Too much work? perhapslooking back to the tech evolution, I'm sure you will be able to profile a good cup of coffee or even my dog, remember Star Trek? "computer, please let a Venusian ... carbonara"
end...yes! You are very lucky!
-
It is true we all would dream of a perfect profiler
the KPA is great but can do better i think
for sure the competition is far behind and of course we don't need all those gadgets like harmoniser, if i want to as an harmoniser, i just bring my Eventide Harmoniser and i am happy
The only thing that is bothering is this problem of slave mode with SP DIF cause the reamping sessions are more complicated this ways
and i believe i am not the only one that purchased the KPA for reamping purposes at 99%
So yes better profiling accuracy and slave mode on SPDIF, all the gadgets can wait !
-
I'd like to be able to assign myself which fx banks you turn on with the footswitch. Like Bank A/Delay, or Mod/Reverb.
-
Please:
An option to put the fx loop behind the delay / reverb slot. So that I can use my Jamman (or any other looper) like it is supposed to be!
-
Please:
An option to put the fx loop behind the delay / reverb slot. So that I can use my Jamman (or any other looper) like it is supposed to be!
couldn't you just put the looper after the Profiler?
-
Please Guys, let the Kemper Team focus on the only thing that is unique in the gear world: "PROFILING AMPS"
who knows how many competitors are already trying to imitate it.
The KPA is NOT a modeler, the KPA is "THE AMP PROFILER", and IMHO is still far from perfection.And if the problem of the profiles not identical to the original, it is not an imperfection of the KPA, but I just do not know how to make a good profile after hundreds of trials under good technical conditions, it means that…. if I'm not a complete idiot, many like me will have the same "so so" results. What happens if, while the Kemper Team is focused on minor things, a competitor invents a profiling system much simpler, that all guitarists can achieve without being technical sages?
I bought the KPA to simplify my work, instead I lose whole days hoping for the exact copy of my amp setup, to use in my projects, and reuse every time I need it instead of miking again the real amp
... out there are dozens of very good modelers doing everything you ask here in this thread…..but only one Profiler thought for other benefits!
Let it do his job at the best! for what is advertised and for the reason we bought it!I hope my English is understandable
Nice weekend to all of you!
Can you mike your amp now, record it, and get the recorded tone you want?
When you make profiles, is your amp isolated in another room?
-
Quote
couldn't you just put the looper after the Profiler?
Hi!
Sorry but this option causes some problems. For example: When playing live, I connect the main outputs to the foh and the monitor out to a poweramp + cabinet.
When connecting the looper to the outputs of the kemper, I will loose the stereo option. I tested this way once and I also noticed a negative influence on the overall sound!will there ever be an option to put the looper behind the delay / reverb block?
-
I can not quote ... this is an answer to Guitartone.
Yes, of course, I'm lucky to have a professional recording studio...and believe me, I'm not here to make controversy, I just try to find a solution. and I repeat, not pedantry, but for clarity, I work in the recording studio for thirty years and I think I have acquired the basic knowledge to make a profile correctly, especially after hundreds of tests
what I get is always the same result. not worse, not better, just different.
perhaps for many it is a good result, but for my work unfortunately, it is not.
describe an acoustic sensation in words is never simple so ... this feeling makes me think of a shift of the harmonic focal point of the tone. the needed results as I said is a similar tone, but harmonically unbalanced . For this reason, an intervention with the EQ does not help.this is the tenth time that I write these things but I have not yet received concrete help ... maybe I'm going crazy and it's time to sell hotdogs at the exit of the subway?
-
don't know way can't quote...
-