Nearly as much about sound , it’s about weight an ease of movement LOL
Neural Quad Cortex
-
-
yes it just felt loose and flubby. Maybe in a little bigger cabinet would help, but the Kab I built is the exact size of the Kemper Kabinet
Interesting. I assume it would not sound very well then with my Enzo Meris synth pedal,
-
it would depend on the sounds you’re using...The B3 organ is really the only patch I use that doesn’t seem to work. For strings and horns it seems to be fine
-
it would depend on the sounds you’re using...The B3 organ is really the only patch I use that doesn’t seem to work. For strings and horns it seems to be fine
Did you try adding a HPF to your B3, that should tighten up the low end?
-
What am I missing here? I'm trying to have an open mind and I realize that patches can be tweaked to taste, etc., but this sounds awful to me. Someone posted this clip over at TGP and it sounds buzzy, fizzy, and like a square wave distortion...somewhat like playing your guitar directly into a solid state mixing board and turning up the input gain.
External Content soundcloud.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy. -
It might be fine with a thick blanket over it... ?
-
It might be fine with a thick blanket over it... ?
It almost sounds like the cab emulation has been turned off.
-
kinda my experience with the QC , so far.
Ill give it another week, but thinking of returning itIt’s not feeling like it’s ready for prime time
-
im so glad that i canceled my order for QC
after i had done this
my Kemper sounded 3 times better than before
and before it sounded already glorious
what a great piece of gear
the most digital piece of gear which sounds and feels so absolute real analog
bravo Kemper
-
Just cancelled my order for the QC too.
Not really feeling too many good vibes.
Im sure its great but ive lost the excitement since my order was placed in January.
-
Many of us could see this coming a mile off.
You guys aren't the first and won't be the last. Just sayin', as they say in the classics.
-
A little bit overhyped.And most people don't like this.Anyway.
Yet would be a great time to announce a "KPA XL" with dual amp,more fx,more I/Os/touchscreen and wifi..for whoever thinks he really needs all this.
And for the rest of us this would give @CK the time to decide about a real KPA 2 which is as revolutionary as the current one was during the last decade.
-
A little bit overhyped.And most people don't like this.Anyway.
Yet would be a great time to announce a "KPA XL" with dual amp,more fx,more I/Os/touchscreen and wifi..for whoever thinks he really needs all this.
And for the rest of us this would give @CK the time to decide about a real KPA 2 which is as revolutionary as the current one was during the last decade.
Good summary. What you call XL would be a real II for me already. Yes, everybody should distinguish between real tool and toy for himself. You can make a lot of money with both.
-
Good summary. What you call XL would be a real II for me already. Yes, everybody should distinguish between real tool and toy for himself. You can make a lot of money with both.
Every music tool is "a toy".That's the reason we "play it"..
Actually I don't know any culture/language which does not describe music tools as "toys to play" with..?
-
Every music tool is "a toy".
Well, no, without wanting to get too philosophical. Otherwise everything you "possess" except food, clothes and shelter are mere toys (wifes included).
"Play" in musical terms is something different (for me) than "playing" with literal toys for the sake of playing (which is biologically spoken learning). Answer to your question: in German, for example, there is a verb for "making music" that does not contain "playing" . I cannot imagine that the ancient Greeks did not have such a word.
-
Well, no, without wanting to get too philosophical. Otherwise everything you "possess" except food, clothes and shelter are mere toys (wifes included).
"Play" in musical terms is something different (for me) than "playing" with literal toys for the sake of playing (which is biologically spoken learning). Answer to your question: in German, for example, there is a verb for "making music" that does not contain "playing" . I cannot imagine that the ancient Greeks did not have such a word.
Welches Instrument machst Du?Oder spielst Du?
Sure you speak correct german?
-
Welches Instrument machst Du?Oder spielst Du?
Sure you speak correct german?
The verb is "musizieren", my friend. Sure you speak German?
-
The verb is "musizieren", my friend. Sure you speak German?
Oh.I understand.So if someone asks you "was spielst Du?" you answer is "Ich musiziere"..
That's fine.A little bit stiff.Hordor style.But in any case it is not wrong.
-
Oh.I understand.So if someone asks you "was spielst Du?" you answer is "Ich musiziere"..
That's fine.A little bit stiff.Hordor style.But in any case it is not wrong.
Man . What's wrong? Leave Hodor alone, he's my friend.. I would say, you are distorting completely what I said: I said, there is a word in German for making music that does not imply "playing", that's all I said. I did not point to what you answer when being asked which musical instrument you "play". We use "play" in this case only because of the absence of a better word, not because we literally compare the biological behavior "playing" with "using an instrument". And yes, people use "musizieren" in Germany a lot in various cases, for example in school language or when people describe social activities. It is not "stiff" at all by itself, it is how you use apply it. Don't blame me, blame those .... German to the bone Germans.
-
No, for many of us not toys. And for many, a device that gets at what the artist is after creatively is good enough—in fact brilliant. That’s maybe why CK & Co seemed, historically, to be bemused by the incessant, vocal hypothetical frustrations of home players. Even so, they have incrementally addressed so many of those “demands”, necessary or not, improvement or not.
This presumption that dual amps or a touch screen—or even lovely new fuzzes—would inevitably improve the Kemper experience ... I personally don’t get. That’s based on owning so many other devices that purport to offer a “modern” UI.
But yes I love that the team is getting deeper in to sound design with effect builds.
I’d like to see a bottom-up redesign of the storage framework, and the rig manager interface in general. But really, that would only improve my life a little. I’d hardly call it a necessity, or an impetus to get a different product. If music comes first, Kemper has been “there” since the beginning.
Anyway yeah I’m pretty sure CK can deliver something new that answers some of the relentless global chatter without fully sacrificing the mindset ethos design sensibility at the core of the KPA identity.
The element of surprise, of delivering on core amp functionality while introducing novel parameters we didn’t know we needed but quickly realized that we did, continues to mean sweet tones and a fun ride.
-