I have seen similar requests but I go again with a strobe like tuner instead of the bubble which works good anyways.
michael
I have seen similar requests but I go again with a strobe like tuner instead of the bubble which works good anyways.
michael
+1
I thought about that, too!
I'm adding my vote for a strobe-like tuner as well.
i think the tuner is ok, it worked vell on my Mandolin too! but i have Buzz Feiten tuning on my main electrics, so i cant use it anyway.. wish i could set BF offsetts
+1 for the strobe, which IMO is easier to read when you're perfectly tuned. Maybe the three tuner LEDs could be programmed to work stroboscopically? (?)
+1 for the strobe, which IMO is easier to read when you're perfectly tuned. Maybe the three tuner LEDs could be programmed to work stroboscopically? (?)
+1 for "stroboscopically"
Why not, +1.
1 more
would be interesting to see how well it would show up on the small screen to make it more functionally friendly than the bubble from a slight distance and beyond.
+1 for "stroboscopically"
More accurate tuning is ALWAYS a positive step forward for ANY device.
+ 1 from me too.
I think this will take substantial resources to develop, resources spent better on more important/pressing things.
The current tuner works more than fine sans Buzz Feiten offsets.
I rather them spend RD money on the foot controller/auto tune/fellatio simulation feature than on a strobe tuner.
Right know i have an additional tuner in my rack. And a Peterson at hand. Therefore I would be pleased to see a strobe inside. But it is surely not my number one priority...
+1
Cannot stand the current tuner display and would love to have an improvement before having to go out and buy yet another piece of gear.
+1 for Buzz Feiten option as tuner preset
That's a good idea.
I rather them spend RD money on the foot controller/auto tune/fellatio simulation feature than on a strobe tuner.
This feature already exists, just unplug the power cable and put it in your mouth
... He maybe meant the other way around?