Hi. I want ask a stupid question: what difference exist among to load on KPA a IR file and a "cabmaker" file?. Thanks in advance
.IR file VS CabMaker file
-
guilleguille -
December 11, 2021 at 3:40 PM -
Thread is marked as Resolved.
-
-
There should be no difference at all, i thnk.
-
This is a great question for Kemper. I too would like to know the differences.
Would be nice to get a file layout definition also so someone could write some code to modify the cab file. Maybe that is something Kemper plans down the line or maybe they feel the CAB Hi/Low/Character/Pure Cab adjustments are enough? I dont know enough about IRs to say.
Since an IR is a wave file showing the frequency response and resonances of an impulse signal, you can load it into a sound editor and EQ it. I use the handy tool Goldwave. You could also write some code to make your own IR and create some other-worldly thing.
It would be nice to see why some CABs are really loud and full of dynamic range and some are not. Could maybe adjust that also in some form of CABMAKER editor.
-
Doesnt RM just do the same thing with the IR file as Cab Maker did (converting it into a Kemper file with 44,1 kHz and 24 bit) ?
-
It would be nice to see why some CABs are really loud and full of dynamic range and some are not. Could maybe adjust that also in some form of CABMAKER editor.
I think the same, so we may load IRs or the same IRs "modified" through CabMaker, but I don't feel differences
-
Doesnt RM just do the same thing with the IR file as Cab Maker did (converting it into a Kemper file with 44,1 kHz and 24 bit)
Yes, You are right. Because of that, I don't feel or hear any difference.
-
CabMaker transforms impulse response wav files into PROFILER cabinet presets. The program is obsolete since this functionality is included in Rig Manager. If you import an impulse response into Rig Manager it gets automatically transformed into a PROFIELR cabinet preset. No extra step no external tool needed anymore.