KPA non-powered rack. Matrix GT1000 power amp. Shure QLX wireless. Furman. Interface at the rear for direct connections. This has been my A rig for years and it has proven to be bullet proof. Thinking of putting my IEM transmitter next to the QLX.....any thoughts on radio interference if I do this? IEM is a PSM900.
Post your Kemper Rig Pictures Please
-
chopshop777 -
September 28, 2014 at 2:10 AM -
Thread is marked as Resolved.
-
-
Edit: Pictures deleted, because I couldn't stand the way my updated "Metal" Kemper room looked for more than 3 days. So it is almost back to classy looking now
-
It needs a female touch Ibot39
-
As much as I like the versitaile sound options and easy connectivity, I´ve found out, that this board is just too much for daily use. It´s large, heavy and bulky with the case.....
So, I´ve decided to build up a 2nd "flight-rig". Dead simple and still more than enough sound options. I´ll keep the big one anyways
Finally, I made the ultimate-definite-final Version (bahahaha) of my Stage-Board.
-
Classy man!
The neatness, custom labels and even those footswitch caps discussed a year or two ago in the forum.
Great job.
-
I like that, frama 78. Did you just Velcro the stage to the pedalboard?
-
-
I like that, frama 78. Did you just Velcro the stage to the pedalboard?
That´s more than enough
-
-
Nice and spacious. Would love to have a drumkit setup like that.
-
Tried to delete my post...no option
-
Finally, I made the ultimate-definite-final Version (bahahaha) of my Stage-Board.
Love it mate, well done!
-
Great window view like some hilly, steepy terrains to walk or ride a mountain bike
-
-
Gee Vinny, quite the elegant step forward compared to what I imagine you were used to back in the day.
-
Gee Vinny, quite the elegant step forward compared to what I imagine you were used to back in the day.
Haha. That is definitely a yes. I loved my Bradshaw systems back then but I would have dumped them all back in the day if I could have had the Kemper. ?
-
Haha. That is definitely a yes. I loved my Bradshaw systems back then but I would have dumped them all back in the day if I could have had the Kemper. ?
really man?do you think the Kemper is better than the Bradshaw system?
-
really man?do you think the Kemper is better than the Bradshaw system?
Absolutely.
The chasing your tale with every new ground loop problem with any new inclusion to the rack is worth it.
Nothing wrong with Bob’s stuff. It’s amazing. It still is and I still own it. But those days of having an 18 unit rack etc are long gone for touring expenses.
The Kemper isn’t a compromise though. It’s an all in one solution.
The Bradshaw part of the system was revolutionary. Wether it was the RSB18 system or the later stuff with CAE RS10, 4x4 and Dual Line Mixers. It set the standard and for me still does.
I am now happy having two flight cases with a main Kemper Stage and a backup Kemper Stage.I have to add, the systems Bob made are only as good as the equipment you load in your rack around them.
The only thing I miss is a much longer delay time for the mono delay.
-
Haha. That is definitely a yes. I loved my Bradshaw systems back then but I would have dumped them all back in the day if I could have had the Kemper. ?
Do you currently use cabs on stage? Did you with your old systems?
-
Do you currently use cabs on stage? Did you with your old systems?
For these last two UK dates, I have taken two Headrush 112 speakers just for something behind me.
Normally, I am straight to PA, monitors and sidefills.Done that with Fractal and now my Kemper’s for years and years now.
Although I took those Headrush cabs, they are not necessary. I am happy with monitors and sidefills.
In my Bradshaw system days, I always had at least two Marshall 1960B cabs onstage.
As soon as you move away from those 4x12’s though, you are reliant on the sidefills and monitors anyway as Marshall 4x12’s don’t really radiate the sound around the stage. They are just a straight beam. Step to the side and you don’t really hear them. -