There were any number of helpful suggestions and explanations as to why there was a difference between the two samples Cedrick posted in the OP, but with all due respect to him, he wasn't open to a number of them. For instance, he didn't like the idea of using a different cab. He also wasn't really open to the idea of tone matching because he didn't want to use tones that have been EQ matched in his projects. Cedrick also mentioned the lack of low-end in a lot of Kemper profiles, to wit I mentioned adding it back in with a Studio EQ. Some (including myself) mentioned that mic and mic positioning play a huge roll in explaining the differences between his original samples, and it was also suggested that most profiles are created by hobbyists while most commercial recordings are created by professionals. Those are just a few examples. Needless to say, there have been some super useful suggestions and rational explanations in this thread. As the old saying goes, you can lead a horse to water...
Ceddy has confided a number of the things pointed out to the forum before, so the thread in 11 pages has evolved beyond just the fizz originally brought up, hence we are speaking of them openly again. When the thread first started I sent a few profiles to Ceddy that I thought might help or give him something more in line with what he's looking for, so it's not as if I'm here to complain or raise a stink. Still, at a certain point some of the things brought up are absolutely what Kemper should invest in improving rather than forum members writing pages trying different techniques and strategies that aren't wholly satisfactory.