Not possible with the KPA?

  • External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

  • In my opinion, the added pumping and snappy attack isn't a product of the amp so much as engineering prowess. I have little doubt it was added in post after the fact, much the way engineers add a similar pumping and snappy attack to percussion. If someone can show me an amp reacting like this in a raw recording, I'm all ears. For instance, listen to live performances of Rainbow In The Dark. You won't hear the pumping or snappy attack. The dynamics are fairly consistent.

    This seems the closest so far. I still need to get onto proper monitors to review, may not happen tonight but definitely tomorrow at latest. (Unexpected family matter)

    Was this JSX profile taken from RE ?

    Pumping has zero to do with the tone structure aspects I'm referring to, so even though that isn't quite matching in the clips, it can be disregarded. As @sambrox suspected, one difference is in the upper end, there's still a different gain content going on that creates the hair and bite (which helps form sort the classic Marshall snarl) that I haven't heard out of the KPA yet. The KPA track has that typical raspy thing going on that is what seems to contributes to the KPA not sounding real at times IMO. If the KPA clip had the right upper end content it might be good enough to call matched. But again, I need to get on proper monitors to listen yet....

    Thanks once again to those who've provided, or planning to provide, constructive contributions.

    Sonic

  • As much as I love Dio, and totally respect Viv Campbell's talent, I am not a big fan of his tone, especially on "Holy Diver", although, that probably has nothing to due with him and everything to do with the recording engineer and/or producer. His guitar is way too compressed, and IMHO does not pop out if the mix...even during the most important part (the solos, of course).

    Now, compare Viv's tone with early Yngwie in Alcatrazz...for instant, the guitar and solo on "Suffer Me". Yng's tone is so open, clear and bell-like, yet still with beautiful gain structure and sustain. I think of it as a heavy metal violin tone.

    Now, IMHO, Viv's use of Dimarzio Dual Sounds (essentially Super Distortions) and a Les Paul are not helping his guitar jump out...which is exactly what does occur with Yngwie's setup of a vintage Strat with Dimarzio FS-1s, into a DOD-250, straight into a dimed Marshall MkII (model 1987).:

    Studio Version

    External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    Live Version (Metallic Live '84)

    External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    I mean, just listen to that "holy grail" golden note at 03:31 of the 2nd video. Chills, dudes...I get chills!

    :thumbup:

    Edited once, last by Tritium (April 19, 2017 at 5:49 AM).

  • Was this JSX profile taken from RE ?


    It's from Guido's Pvy JSX profile pack.

    Pumping has zero to do with the tone structure aspects I'm referring to, so even though that isn't quite matching in the clips, it can be disregarded. As @sambrox suspected, one difference is in the upper end, there's still a different gain content going on that creates the hair and bite (which helps form sort the classic Marshall snarl) that I haven't heard out of the KPA yet. The KPA track has that typical raspy thing going on that is what seems to contributes to the KPA not sounding real at times IMO. If the KPA clip had the right upper end content it might be good enough to call matched. But again, I need to get on proper monitors to listen yet....


    In my opinion, the harsh, biting top end content was potentially added in post via layering because I don't hear it on most of the other tracks or live, for the most part anyway.

  • I agree about Viv's tone, I was never a huge fan of the tone per-se, more the material. But that tone is just one of many that demonstrates some of the attributes that I can't get yet out the KPA, that's the reason I chose it as an example. And yes, the Dimarzio's he uses aren't helping matters in terms of an open tone, nor is all that compression on the track.

    Yngwie is a pioneer in his playing all on his own, just great ,and good solo tones. But I can't stand Yngwie's rhythm tones, yuk. <X

  • As much as I love Dio, and totally respect Viv Campbell's talent, I am not a big fan of his tone, especially on "Holy Diver"

    I love the sound of the guitars in the mix on Rainbow In The Dark. I mean, it's really hard for me to listen to them in isolation, but in the mix they sound killer to my ears. I think the core tone was quite good on many of Dio's early albums, but I'd love to hear the guitars remastered.

  • Yes, I get that there are "congestion issues" as they've come to be called, but there are also some profilers that have managed to mitigate at least some of those effects, I'm sure through many hours of experimentation

    If some have managed to do this to a great extend it would be bloody awesome if they could explain here on the forums how they do it. Profilling 20 plus set ups and always having the same issues.. I am skeptical of whether people have actually managed to rid profiles from this effect. To some extend, maybe yes, but I do that too; and what is left is still an issue for me.

    Heck, I'd be willing to sell my grandmom into slavery for someone revealing this magical info... Or they could even release a short ebook about profiling tips, price it at 200 dollars and I would buy it, no question.

  • Did these for @SonicExporer but sharing here since people on this thread may be interested.

    It's a laney amp with power stage cooking on 10/10. Preamp on 7/10 and an inbuilt boost on 3/10.

    It's probably the most success I've had with multiple stages distorting. There is congestion and some "raspyness" (same issue imo) but you get that without power amp blasting too, so it's not like the power amp is causing this here.

    Using rather low output PAFF pickups, mind you.

    Studio, direct and merged profiles.

    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sivjinb00wt…VL9CCwKK_a?dl=0

  • Sounds like it too (like the power amp is cooking noodles).. So it's not like the kemper cannot do power amp distortion ever when multiple stages distorting.

    External Content soundcloud.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

  • Cripes, I'm hearing that power-amp hair, Dimitris! I'm guessing you must have done a bang-up job then.

    This must surely be it (the distortion) 'cause it was immediately-obvious based on my memory of the Dio clip. Stands out like dogs' balls, mate.

    Sonic, I do believe I'm hearing it now; it's obviously a matter of knowing what you're looking for, and descriptive words don't quite cut it - one has to hear and identify it, and then it's all over, red rover.

  • Cripes, I'm hearing that power-amp hair, Dimitris! I'm guessing you must have done a bang-up job then.

    This must surely be it (the distortion) 'cause it was immediately-obvious based on my memory of the Dio clip. Stands out like dogs' balls, mate.

    Sonic, I do believe I'm hearing it now; it's obviously a matter of knowing what you're looking for, and descriptive words don't quite cut it - one has to hear and identify it, and then it's all over, red rover.

    I hope so, cheerios! Don't know if this is what sonic is looking for, but there is substantial power amp gain an preamp gain going on here, let alone even a boost added in. Have not heard many profiles that crank up amps this way imho.

    @SonicExporer You may want to experiment with different cabs using the direct profile too if you don't like the studio profile cab.

  • @Dimi84 , thanks for this ! I hope to get around to catching up on things tonight at home.

    I'm getting an error accessing the SoundCloud link though.....

    We still need to figure out how external pedal boost (overdrive & tube screamers) fits into this equation since that is 3rd key element in many of the 80's tones. Can the KPA handle profiling some of that on the front end as well along with some preamp and hard power stage cranking?

    @Monkey_Man , mind you I haven't been able to listen Dimi's clip yet, but you are correct in that once you hear (or learn to hear) what I'm referring to it then becomes apparent what I've been saying all along. When high gain guitars are set into mixes, due to the way they are often set, it is the upper midrange and the nuances of gain content that make the difference between great guitar tones, and more importantly the difference between real vs. fabricated. This is what caught my ear immediately the first day I plugged into the KPA at home, I realized something wasn't right. Again, keep in mind this still does not mean the issue is the KPA, it could be a tweaking thing or profiling matter as well. The whole point of this thread (and other's I've tried to convey things on) is to simply get the tones I'm looking for while also trying to find out what the root problem is so we can either get it resolved or learn how to tackle it. And everybody stands to learn and benefit from this.

    It is not yet clear if the congested/raspy attribute of tones found in almost all the profiles I hear out of the KPA are the same underlying issue but it seems to me they may very well be related.

    Sonic

    Edited once, last by SonicExporer (April 19, 2017 at 3:50 PM).

  • The boost I'm using here is internal to the amp but not much different from using an external one. And it profiled ok. Nothing particularly off about it (again, apart from congestion/raspyness, blah blah).

  • What is the model of Laney? I'd like to research and learn what kind of boost is inside....

    But I'm pretty sure that if I try an external pedal the result will be similar. It'll do fine. Can test later, but not expecting it to fail.

  • Ok, on break I borrowed a set of headphones to listen....still need to listen at home on proper monitors, but heard enough to make these comments:

    @Dimi84 , sounds interesting, yes, can hear some of the output mojo starting to come in. For future reference you're going to want to dial back the EQ on the amp in the mid/low areas to get that stuffiness out. That's a pretty typical side effect of cranking up an amp without re-balancing the EQ settings on the amp. I should have mentioned that when you indicated you were going to try some power stage testing. Apologies, my bad.

    @ColdFrixion , Ok, the tonal structure is best I've heard so far, better than I was able to get using existing profiles so far. However, it is definitely not right, still not real sounding to my ears although getting close. It's that upper area we've been discussing. You've come this far, by all means it would be great if you truly feel the remaining difference is post production. I don't believe so, and I say this because I've never heard of that being the case in everything I've worked on.

    Back in the day, these sounds came about as a matter of standard practice, that's what's so different compared to us looking back and thinking there's tricks involved, analyzing details. There really were no tricks in the sense of the missing elements we are chasing. We never analyzed details back then as we are doing now because everything just came about as standard practice. Using the right rig and standard studio gear/techniques just produced the results we are chasing today. If there's ways to do some kind of post production to get the missing elements then by all means somebody please share, but that certainly wasn't the case back then. Whatever gets us there today I'm open to, the procedural path doesn't have to be the same. Some of you guys who are more up on all the modern digital tools & tricks might be able to solve the remaining differences, I simply have no idea.

    Sonic

  • For future reference you're going to want to dial back the EQ on the amp in the mid/low areas to get that stuffiness out. That's a pretty typical side effect of cranking up an amp without re-balancing the EQ settings on the amp

    Rather dialed back already.

  • Here are some tips for anybody who is interested in setting up a rig for output section involvement....
    These are general guidelines I have found work well as standard practice. However I am coming to realize maybe this isn't common knowledge, so thought maybe it would be helpful to share.....

    - USING A CAB THAT CAN HANDLE THE POWER OF THE AMP.....
    - Connect, but turn off, any OD/boost stomp
    - Set the preamp/MV low (think spanky clean edge of breakup)
    - Start cranking up the volume to max, hit an A chords and if a muddy mess occurs start backing down until it starts defining back up. If at this point you do not sense any output stage "breakup"/distortion you may need different tubes and re-biasing. The best tones sometimes are obtained with low rated output tubes, but that isn't always a requirement.
    - If the tone is stuffy in the low/mid area, then dial back those areas on the amp's EQ, and re-balance volume again.
    - Then start bringing up the preamp gain, continue to raise as long as good definition & tone is retained.
    - Turn on the stomp and adjust accordingly.

    Repeat the same sequential paradigm using small adjustments as needed to make final refinements to the tone.

    Oh - also - keep in mind the presence control can really alter the overall sound of the amp when you start hammering the output section, so you may want to treat that as a whole separate tone shaping tool in the guidelines above, it can vary between amps depending on the circuit design involved.

    When cranking a tube amp and using multiple gain stages you want to pay close attention to the tweaks you make as the smallest of nuances can have a greater impact than at lower volume levels. Don't simply move a knob by an increment of "1" and assume it's a small alteration. Once you get near a good tone, start being careful as to what you tweak and how many tweaks are done at once, or you may have to start the sequence all over again.

    This approach should help in the vast majority of instances for those of you guys wanting to get the real cranked amp sounds found on so many of the recordings back in the day. Mic choice & placement are other important factors but I'm not getting into that here., the important part is start with a rig that is producing the proper elements to begin with, and this approach should help get you there. Lastly, keep in mind some amps (or tubes) are just not the kind that like to cooperate for these tones, but even still cranking them up will at least get that speaker/amp interaction going which is also a part of the power section contribution. Always try to identify the best sounding speaker(s) in the cab to mic. They will not necessarily be the same ones you may be used to micing when the amp is not loud with the output section highly engaged.

    Hope this is helpful information of some use, inside insight from the past you aren't probably going to get from most public resources.

    Cheers,

    Sonic

    Edited 3 times, last by SonicExporer (April 19, 2017 at 7:12 PM).

  • This is a rather specific "power tube distortion" set up though, suited for the tones described. You'll get sometimes bands that will purposely avoid this, instead wanting the power section to sag as much as possible. Since your set up for getting such a response from power sections is quite specific, let alone getting into micing, it's not surprising there aren't many profiles out there that do it. That is why the kemper is so useful for someone who already has his desired tones from real amps.

    That said I do believe profiling this kind of tones would be even easier than totally blasting power amp stages, which at least sometimes the kemper can also do anyway (as it did with these profiles, which are just balls to the wall). Can dial the power section lower if you want me to while still having power tube distortion. I would usually try to get a less "muddy" tone, but was surprised at how well the kemper profiled this particular tone (as always, apart from congestion issue) and pushed it to the limits. At this point I'd expect the profile to be well off, but it wasn't.

    Anyway, I can do another profile with maxon in front, less mids/bass, not cranking power stage that much. The tubes in it are not the best. I will probably replace them with some EL 84 tube amp company I worked for has laying around; probably gonna make the amp sound considerably better, but EL 84s do get quite muddy at such levels anyway.