I've done four gigs in the past week with 3.01 - no issues here, either.
FW 3.0 - opinions?
-
Quitty -
February 24, 2015 at 4:26 PM -
Thread is marked as Resolved.
-
-
Paul,
What version of Rig Manager are you running? is it stable with 3.0.1? -
Sambrox,
Oh! I see why they called the new profiles DI - should called them DI'd
I recommended the Countryman 45 for this on another thread, on a related front we have been beginning to use the Kemper for BASS guitar and people are posting DI profiles for Bass! that's where things are going to overlap and get confusing. -
Paul,
What version of Rig Manager are you running? is it stable with 3.0.1?I'm using the latest version from the Kemper website. I've not had any problems with it.
-
Oh! I see why they called the new profiles DI - should called them DI'd
Here are the official names for Profile types:
Studio Profiles ( the traditional Kemper profile)
Merged Profiles (Studio + Direct Amp profile)
Direct Amp Profiles (a guitar amplifier without the speaker cabinet)
Direct Profiles (just a preamp or processor) -
In my opinion the term "studio " should be replaced with a more accurate term - I would delineate it like this - pre amp, is PreA, power amp is PwrA, speaker is Spkr in the comments box - a merged entire amp would be:
prea-pwra-spkr and any portion you profiled would be obvious and searchable - what are your thoughts on accurate labeling terms? -
In my opinion the term "studio " should be replaced with a more accurate term - I would delineate it like this - pre amp, is PreA, power amp is PwrA, speaker is Spkr in the comments box - a merged entire amp would be:
prea-pwra-spkr and any portion you profiled would be obvious and searchable - what are your thoughts on accurate labeling terms?This method would not be able to tell a studio profile from a merged profile, cause they are both prea-pwra-spkr-mic (the mic-tag would be necessary, because you can also profile virtual amps from the computer that don't need microphone [or have virtual microphones selectable]). I like the existing definitions, it was/is hard enough to establish them.
What we need now, is proper usability of those definitions in rig exchange and KPA. They are essential for a profile and should be visible/detectable/sortable all the time and in the first place. -
In my opinion the term "studio " should be replaced with a more accurate term - I would delineate it like this - pre amp, is PreA, power amp is PwrA, speaker is Spkr in the comments box - a merged entire amp would be:
prea-pwra-spkr and any portion you profiled would be obvious and searchable - what are your thoughts on accurate labeling terms?I think all should simply use the official terms
-