yes its a copyright Problem, but sometimes i find it funny to guess what
amp in real was profiled 
yes its a copyright Problem, but sometimes i find it funny to guess what
amp in real was profiled
Just press the amp button and you have the answer
I don't know if copyright prohibits the naming of a specific amp, but half the time I honestly have no idea what half the amps are in different profile packs.
Maybe it's just me but it would be so much easier if it just said what amp was being profiled in as concise a way as is possible
dz Herbert, rz 5150, stl evh5150iii. With some you have the answer right away.
yes its a copyright Problem, but sometimes i find it funny to guess what
amp in real was profiled
I figured as much, but I still feel like noting for example a JTM45 as a Marsh45 rather than a cryptic one would be easier surely
Just press the amp button and you have the answer
This works in rig manager but not on the sellers website though
Based on amp X is what I see on all profilers sites where I have purchased. If nothing, that's bad, but you can always mail and ask them. But to me it doesn't really matter that much. It's more important if I like the profiles or not. Yes I have seen some smaller profilers where there's no information on what amp(s)been used, no demo sound nor any free profiles. Honestly who do they believe will buy anything then?
It's all about risk.
I don't know if copyright prohibits the naming of a specific amp, but half the time I honestly have no idea what half the amps are in different profile packs.
It has been my experience that the majority of the commercial profile creators out there will include a PDF or readme file that "decodes" the naming conventions.
I felt the same way when I just got my Kemper. Now I hardly notice. Maybe a wiki page somewhere for newcomers would be handy? Like a thesaurus.
