Quote
No, they didn't.
Obviously they have another approach to profiling/capturing (otherwise thy'd have violated Kempers' patents), but I've seen absolutely no evidence yet they took technology a step further .
Watch this video and be enlighted
Call it profiling or capturing, it's the same technology but with neutral's working better.
Not a really a shame for Kemper, it is normal that technology gets better after 10 years and someone else finds a similar way to to things. But kemper has to improve profiling now.
Otherwise, when the community of the quadcortex grows many people will switch to neural.
They just relied on their 10 year old algorithms and now someone came up with a better working way.
A nice feature of improvement would be to actually have the EQ react like the real amp's eq.