I wonder if this is a job for DeOxit?
Hm probably not on an endless encoder. These are not pots.
I wonder if this is a job for DeOxit?
Hm probably not on an endless encoder. These are not pots.
Thanks BayouTexan I usually write down which profile I used on the song track name, but not the settings beyond that.
Have you tried the rig keeper VST BTW?
There is nothing standard about feeding a high-z input with a line level. But if it sounds good, it is good.
Sorry I wasn't clear. Try turning the foot switch knob #5 and press it again.
Try rotating the knob slightly and press it again. Maybe repeat. Does that change anything?
Great! A lot of people will love this new addition.
Reportedly now a known issue.
I would say the main modulation effect comes from a phaser. It's a very "mouthy" sound (not sure that makes any sense at all). The chorusing could very well stem from it being a 12 string. Perhaps try recording the part twice (if you don't have a 12 string) and then apply the same phaser to both tracks.
Per. Stop what you are doing and try this:
Have you tried the rig keeper plugin? It does that even better because it also stores the tweaked rig in there.
Most (not all though, Nova comes to mind) eq plugins you are used to in your DAW apply all their bands in series. So you are probably more used to this situation than you think. They all affect the signal. Applying two 6db per octave filters in series is like having one 12db per octave. Given that they are set at the same cutoff frequency.
Gimmick. A.I. can only mimiq what it's programing tells it too. That programming is made by humans. It can't "think" at least not yet. When it does, music won't matter anymore.
That statement is probably true for this wording, but it's not correct in general regarding AI. The NAM models are absolutely not programmed. They are trained using AI.