<p>I say this with peace and love</p>
<p>Most of my posts have been about this very issue.</p>
<p>I'd say there is a lot of room for improvement. I've never been able to capture the magic of any of my Mesa preamps. </p>
<p>It does a good job profiling the whole rack minus effects, miked through a cab. That is not what I bought it for.</p>
<p>I mainly do preamp profiles hoping that one day I can replace my Mesa quad and Triaxis and have my favorite settings in my Kemper. But running profiles through the rest of the rack sounds mediocre at best, compared to the real thing.</p>
<p>It is very easy for me to tell if it's a preamp profile vs a real preamp.</p>
<p>I've given up on trying since the update that supposedly made it perfect for direct amp and preamp profiles didn't solve the issue. I've made hundreds of preamp profiles since that update and not once felt it captured the mojo.<span style="line-height:1.28">It sounds similar but is always missing something, and feels very different to me when playing.</span></p>
<p>If you've had better luck than good for you. It's just not quite there for me.</p>
<p>Maybe I just have hard to profile amps? If that's the case, then there is a prime opportunity for them to step up and improve the profiling algorithm.</p>
<p>I think the real problem is the fanboys who run around flaming anyone with a opinion that their precious isn't perfect. I for one rarely participate in this forum because of this.</p>
<p>Mr Kemper probably thinks it's already perfect, due to them.</p>
<p>Once again, I feel like I'm pissing in the wind. If/when they ever fix this I'll be the first to sing their praises, until then it is what it is.</p>