I hear these types of tones used in a lot of todays music (not only radio, but TV, film, etc).
And I can't tell the difference in what is live and what is Memorex (am I dating myself with that line?)
I hear these types of tones used in a lot of todays music (not only radio, but TV, film, etc).
And I can't tell the difference in what is live and what is Memorex (am I dating myself with that line?)
So the first one was a Kemper. Although it sounds better, I think the aim of profiling is that we should get the same sound. I am finding this a bit difficult to achieve at the moment but maybe I am just an unrefined refiner and need to go to a studio so that I'm not in the room with my amp while A/B ing over headphones.
I have conducted a similar experiment, but with flacs rather than mp3s, in the thread on Rig and Profile Exchange "1958 Deluxe" dated 18 Feb.
So, regarding the "Blind Test 1" and "Blind Test 2" clips, it seems the guesses pretty much evened out to 50/50. The KPA was clip 1, and the amp was clip 2.
Here is a new one - our Bogner Shiva 2x12 el34, and the KPA profile of it. So far with both examples, the results of the opinions have been a coin toss, so it appears as though the KPA is a pretty serious contender here. Anyhow, one of the Shiva-KPA clips is the amp, one the KPA....
The first clip is..err..clipping so it's a little difficult.
That means clip 2 sounds better and is therefore the KPA.
The first clip is..err..clipping so it's a little difficult.
That means clip 2 sounds better and is therefore the KPA.
+1
2 KPA