Posts by Steve5478

    i, ve got a bug with performance and transpose : 2rigs with -1 transpose but after the restart, only the first sound good, the second has a -1 transpose but sounds like an 0 transpose

    Salut warlus1 ,

    Does it happen on a mark I unit or a mark II ?

    I've got a similar problem ; i've done a transposed rig in one of my perfomance (-1/2) with acoustic simulator. I've put a boost to play solo's song, when i activate it, the volume level stays the same, i changed the boost block position in the chain but the same conclusion. I thought it was due to acoustic sim....

    But can it be linked to transpose feature ?

    The Player seems to match your needs !

    The only questions would be ;

    Do you switch on/off more than one/many effect seperatly per rig ? Do you use a volume pedal ? Do you use a pedal for morphing or the switch ? (Don't you know you can use the volume pedal parameter to behaves as a booster and place it where you want in the chain for all your rigs) ;)

    IMO, you could have the following configuration :

    - Left and Right switch to go up/down

    - middle switch to enable/disable one/some effects

    - Pedal for morphing/boost

    IMO, two buttons together is too complicated if you want a quick action....

    Salut,

    Je n'utilise pas du tout le midi avec mes profiler mais j'ai trouvé cette ancienne vidéo qui, j'imagine, doit toujours être d'actualité ;)

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    I have never profiled :| but there is always the amp section when you profile....

    3 possibilities :

    - Studio profile ; you profile your amp+cab and the Profiler split automatically the amp part and the cab one.

    - DI Profile ; you profile only the amp section...

    - Merged profile, you profile amp and cab but use the FX loop's amp so it's more precise to distinguish amp from cab...

    IMO, the last methode should be the best in your case. Take a look at the cable plan in the manual, insert a FX loop block in your AX8 (if it's possible)

    If it's not possible, the first methode + copy your cab profile and paste it in other profiles....

    I've read that recently in the manual, and noticed what you tell too ;

    "We also suggest starting with no other active effects when exploring the Acoustic Simulator, and remember you’ll also need to use the Input Noise Gate, as this effect will strongly emphasize pick up noise."

    The examples given in the acoustic sim for HB or SC all seem to work with the neck pickup ;)

    I don't know if someone tried it but ;

    I've read and understood that cab's V2.0 parameters are effective and can only be changed with markII devices, it's OK, but, as it is an important factor in the final sound my question is ;

    If i change those parameters with a mark II device to obtain the sound i like, save my profile on my PC and push this one in my mark I device, does the sound change too or does it go back to the original profile ?

    If i understand it correctly ; OP wants to have the possibility to change slots in a performance and coming back to the first one having the last changed done (but not the stored rig)... I think it corresponds to edit's behavior when a tab or a PC is connected to rig manager....

    I definitely prefer the 2.0 profiles personally. I have tried them on both Mark 2 Rack and Mark 1 Powered Toaster. Although Kemper says that 2.0 are lower resolution on Mark 1 hardware, I don’t hear a meaningful difference. They sound great on both.

    I’ve tried it with a few condenser mics too but the SM57 is a known entity so seems like the obvious choice for a simple comparison between the two types of profile which is all I was hoping to achieve.

    I read on the manual that to profile V2.0, a PC has to be hooked to the device to select profile V2.0 even for bigger units. is it a must ?

    I assume that the computer goes farther than just a simple selection on the process !?

    Am i right or not ?

    On this demo and the demo he did with MBritt and the Ola V2 Profile demo ..... the Profiles are pretty much excellent however its clear to my ears that the Profile is ever so slightly under-gained compared to the real Amp.

    If this is a consistent "thing" ...... hopefully this is an easy fix before going Public Release

    Pesonnally I don't hear a gain difference (but didn't listen to everything). Cause, i've stopped judging Utube's devices sounds comparisons till the day i couldn't hear a difference between a Stage and a Helix on some of them. But when i play those both units at home ; it's night and day. We are guitarist, not only audience, we have an interaction and a reaction between our playing and the instrument/rig....

    I retain here the aspect of "More Airy, 3D effect" (described by T.Dill too) --> we will be able to discover that only by ourselves...

    In a way, I'm a little disappointed as the longer it goes on, the more likely people will get fed up and sell their MK2, so I was hoping to pick up a bargain ha!

    Seriously I am joking, just hope they don't sell out now!!!

    I watched the used mark I units on the market today 😉

    Imo, the bargain is going to be there really soon 😉

    The first heads are around 500/600€ :/

    I found the information in the Player manual (p57/182) ; it seems it's only in the cab section (so for specific rigs if you want to ; it seems logical)

    " For specific situations, e.g. temporarily playing bass guitar through a studio or merged PROFILE of a bass amp, you can enforce full-range mode by selecting “Full-Range“ from the Imprint Select options found within the cabinet module."