Are you saying that right is always higher than left or right with xlr is higher than left with 1/4” jack?
The 1/4” jack puts are unbalanced TS not balanced TRS so should be 6db lower than balanced xlr
Are you saying that right is always higher than left or right with xlr is higher than left with 1/4” jack?
The 1/4” jack puts are unbalanced TS not balanced TRS so should be 6db lower than balanced xlr
It’s literally one pf the first things you see when you go to make a post on the Issues - Get Help section of the forum.
It’s amazing how much difference a power amp can make. I have a Triaxis preamp which doesn’t sound great profiled by itself but does sound great profiled with a power amp. I then did a test and profiled my Mesa 2:ninety poweramp without the Triaxis. It makes a pretty interesting experiment to try something like a Kemper Drive or Mouse into the 2:ninety power amp profile to see how big an impthe poweramp actually makes.
Have you tried putting the DHR on the floor next to the Marshall cab or putting your head down in front of the Marshall to make a comparison?
I’m not ttying to be a jerk it’s just that the DHR is firing high frequencies (which are very directional) at your ears so you hear them. Whereas, the marshall cab is firing them at the back of your legs so you don’t hear them highs. This will emphasise the bass and lower mids which will definitely affect your perception of the tone. Before you started using the DHR you may not have been aware of this but now that you are used to hearing a full range sound it might make the traditional sound strange. Another way to rule out this effect thought would be to just use the JVM. If the real amp sounds good then it’s probably not speaker position but I would still do a comparison just to help understand how much impact speaker position has on our perception of on stage sound.
I’ve never played a JVM410 but it might be the power amp itself if you play loud. Amps like Soldano aim for a clean (hi/fi) power amp with the tone coming almost entirely from the pre amp. However, Marshalls have traditionally relied on the power amp to createe the sound. If you’ve ever tried an old JCM800 at low volumes you’ll know it is a piercing sterile piece of crap. However, turn it up and let the power amp overdrive and it becomes an absolute beast. If the JVM410 is anything like old Marshalls in this respect you could be adding another level of distortion to the Kemper rig which could easily get very flubby.
I have to tell this again... Turning my profiler on, the green screen shows the progress of starting up. After 4/5 seconds the line stops and everything freezes! Wating for a number of seconds I'm about to restart the profiler and then suddenly out of the blue my last used rig appears....
Have you raised a support ticket as Ruefus suggested? That is the best solution by far. Support do look at the forum but I’m sure they don’t have time to read every post in case there is something they need to deal with. That is why the support email exists.
I’m sort of half joking (but totally serious too); what about Evertune bridges on the guitars. That way they stay permanently in tune and don’t need tuned during the show. Needs a new guitar or surgery to replace the bridge on an existing guitar (also doesn’t work if you need a whammy bar) but does solve the tuning issue.
If you use active pickups you may be able to insert a tuner with cables to and from a tuner on stage, between the wireless receiver and the Kemper. Then the tuner will mute the input of the Kemper. Long cable run though...
Shouldn’t matter what type of pickups are being used. Once the signal hits the wireless the pickups don’t have any effect on the impedance.
How about a midi controlled A/B switcher with A going to Kemper and B going to tuner?
There might even be and A/B switcher with an external footswitch (like the Dunlop rack mounted wahs for example) where the A/B could be next to the receiver to keep cable run short but the pedal could be front of stage along with a tuner.it would actually be a very simple circuit for someone to make themselves or have a tech make for them if nothing already exists.
I didn't know that. My knowledge of Dimebag was that EVH loved him and gave him "bumblebee" to pass with to the next dimension.
I believe he played a Randall solid state amp because they were "tighter" sounding than valves but I'm not a Pantera fan so don't ask me for any more details than that.
Try playing a Roland Jazz chorus on a Pantera song. The listener will care.
Dimbag played a solid state amp. So pretty much the same thing
The older OS doesn't appear to show Noise Gate setting on the Input Menu. The newer version does which means that the Reamp Sens has been moved onto a second page to accomodate this.
The second picture scares me. Clean sense at +7.4 😳 if I did that I would need to boost all my distorted sounds by about 15db to make the, audible.
It is set at 3 as default but can be overridden easily. However, one thing many users are not aware of is that the pure cab parameter appears in two places- one global and the other rig specific. The higher value always has priority. i.e. if the rig specific value is set to 0 but the global value is still at 3, Pure Cab will still be applied at 3. If the rig level value is 3 and the global value is 0 Pure Cab will also use a value of 3. To turn Pure Cab off completely both values would need to be set to 0.
I personally like it at 3 and have never felt the need to change it. I have tried experimenting with it but just set it back to 3 in the end.
It sounds like you’ve been tomhell and back Larry. I hope you’re over the worst and getting better every day. You need to be ready for some jigging at Hogmanay.
IMG_1839.jpeg
Amp Volume does seem to have an effect on tone in that it’s in the amp section. It’s then feeding into the cab section and effects slots post cab.
With it set high you can cause a weird note trail fizz, I’m guessing from how it affects the cab section. Rig and Master don’t cause that.
The 0nly difference I can f9nd between Amp Volume and the others is where you have a volume sensitive effect post stack. For example if you have Compressor or OD/Boost/Fuzz after the Stack then there will be a difference. Otherwise they are identical.
Bluetooth is only for audio streaming.
You have merely stated how clean compensation works. I know how it works.
The problem is the volume adjustment is too large.
It's a bit discouraging having to make up for such a large volume adjustment in every rig simply for wanting the profile to respond to boosts/drives in front like an amp does.
Surely all you need to do is not turn the compensation all the way to 0?
It all depends on what kind of music you are playing and what sort of tone you are after.
As DonPetersen said, use way less gain than you think you need.
If you have a good sound at high volume but it gets muddy at low volume, that's natural due to the way our ears work. Basically, our hearing is more sensitive to mid frequencies than extreme lows and highs. That's why old HiFi's had a "loudness" control and some attenuators have a "contour control (Two Notes Torpedo Reload for example). The key would be to cut some of the mids as you turn the volume down. This won't necessarily result in a tone that translates well to loud playing such as gigs but it will kill some of the muddiness for your monitors at lower volume.
... one of the Best ever ....
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
A monster. Called “The Humbler” for good reason.
G String thank you, sir. That makes sense. Understand now 👍