Explanation and apology offered just 2 posts after SFG asked me this, and yet both you and he choose to ignore it.
Yes, and I acknowledged this and explained that I was saying what those differences typically mean to me. I won't rehash the post, but they concerned more openness in the top end and the minimisation of low-mid "funk"; I specifically spoke about these in the context of mixing.
Thank you for sharing those differences as you saw them, by the way, pbfoot.
I'd have appreciated it if you'd taken the time to read my clarification and apology before lumping me into the "douche" category, mate. I made a hasty mistake by not specifying that it was my interpretation, for my purposes and tastes, that I'd now-regrettably shared.
I wasn't going to bother contributing again, but as I've said on this forum before, I detest the deliberate protraction of mischaracterisations of folks, even in the light of genuine contrition, especially when the object of said action is me.
I therefore offer the apology part of the quote for your appraisal in case you somehow missed it:
Hmm... said sorry twice and edited the offending post to reflect verbatim what you said.
One couldn't wish for more from a douche, now could one?