Posts by urpilus

Quote from G String

There are EQ options with variable frequencies if you prefer to adjust @2.5k

I know, I just wanted to point out that the difference between the old graphic eq and the new one isn't "not signifiant and even hard to hear"

I’ve noticed that when users make requests, you often downplay the issue just to close the question. I understand that many of these requests are "trivial" for you, but I’d be curious to know how many of them have actually been granted. Otherwise, there’s no reason for this section of the forum to exist.

Quote from Burkhard

The frequency changes correspond to one third, which is not signifiant and even hard to hear.

From 2.5 khz to 2.0 is signifiant and not hard to hear, IMO.

Hi, I'd like to ask if it’s possible to restore the old graphic EQ: I prefer the previous frequencies (650Hz, 1.25kHz, 2.5kHz, 5kHz).
It would be great to choose between the current "Graphic Eq A" and the previous "Graphic Eq B"

Thanks a lot!

Read and try this:

Thread

Cab High Shift and Low Shift

Hi Everyone,

I've owned three different Kempers over the last 7 years and only now have started experimenting with the Cab High Shift and Low Shift options. I have to say that they have greatly improved some of my fave profiles (especially the high gain ones). I find that increasing the High Shift and lowering the Low Shift just makes certain profiles pop (make more "in your face") Just curious if anyone else has had the same experience and how you all use those settings.

gonzalez7711

February 7, 2021 at 3:17 AM

Quote from Finally

I said "not relevant in most professional music situations".

Is that incorrect? You see a lot of studios using ASIO drivers with Windows PCs??

So, you think there are more Kempers in professional studios than in the homes of musicians who use a simple Windows PC...
I don't think so.

Quote from G String

Most users don’t even use the ASIO driver. So why hold back OS14 for the majority when OS13 remains a perfectly adequate option for the smaller group that relies on ASIO?

In the meantime, two new official releases: has the ASIO driver issue been resolved?
"The smaller group" thanks you.

+1 PLEASE!!

+1

Quote from G String

Most users don’t even use the ASIO driver. So why hold back OS14 for the majority when OS13 remains a perfectly adequate option for the smaller group that relies on ASIO?

IMO, if OS14 has known bugs, it should be released as beta, not as an official (fully functional) release.

G String is it possible to fix known issues before releasing a new firmware?

The ASIO driver problem in Windows DAWs is still present: many people, like me, still can't update to OS 14.

Thank you for your attention!

I agree that they shouldn't have released the new firmware without fixing all the issues in the beta version.
We're all beta testers now.

Quote from haruccigr

Kemper should have had their own official profile packs. Content creator packs like Dill are welcome however not the same thing.

I agree: Kemper should provide an official 2.0 start pack with professional profiles that should indicate the full potential rigs to the customer.

It's hard to understand why Kemper doesn't know how to profile as well as the other profilers!

I don't want to argue, it's just a personal opinion

Thank you!

Are profiles V2?

Quote from where is christophe

Isn't it supposed to be a volume (only) boost ?

try putting a flat eq with +1db volume and a Pure Boost with +1db after the stack, alternate them: for me they sound slightly different

Quote from JedMckenna

This does nothing to the tone, it just raises the volume. Same effect as Rig Volume.

I don't agree: IMHO the sound is more airy and slightly fatter with the Pure Boost after stack

All the instruments in a song contribute to the sound perception of a single instrument.
Look for the isolated track of Steve Stevens' guitar in "Rebel Yell": you'll be very disappointed!

https://urlsand.esvalabs.com/?u=https%3A%2F…19db867&f=n&p=y

Quote from Machine Bohemian

Line 6 has a sustainer that is great for "Sustaniac" type sustain for leads. I'd love the Kemper to have something like that.

+1

Quote from 00diablo00

So, looking at the market, quite a few things have shifted since Kemper’s profiling technology came out.

I’ve used the unit for a long time with great satisfaction (rack first, then stage when it came out, switched a little time to QC but now returning back home), but it’s starting to show its age.

Personally, I’d love a more accurate profiling algorithm that can capture even the most complex amplifiers (anyone who’s tried to profile distorted Mesa amps knows what I mean). I’d also like the ability to run two profiles in series, and if possible, a more precise capture of fuzz-like tones.

Do you think something is brewing, or are we in for a few more years of treading water with what we have now?

I would like:
to be able to modify the rigs like the modelers
to improve the sounds of mesa, soldano, etc.
touch screen

thanks!

Thank you man!

Quote from DonPetersen

I guess he is requesting more Amp Models for Liquid Profiles.

It's been almost 1 year since the liquid profiles release... but many amplifiers are still missing, for example the Bogner family.
even the Namm news (the new tremolos) have not yet come out.
I think that the updates time are a bit too long: am I too picky?