• So much discussion in the various forums about how it's a game change, will make every other modeler obsolete.

    I've spent hours trying to get good clean sounds and good dumble sounds using NAM Rig and Tone3000 and nothing compares to the sounds I get out of the kemper. Maybe it's a matter of downloading the proper captures but they all sound boxy and not having great time based effects built in seems really limiting and requires multiple passes of A/D to use for recording if you're using multiple VSTs. The latency was off-putting.

  • I'm not moving from Kemper anytime soon and have used a Profiler since 2013. It still outperforms and sounds better than any other option for me. My concern for Kemper is the younger players coming up will always go for the free option regardless of other features. NAM is a formidable threat for manufacturers with a closed system.

    The key to everything is patience.
    You get the chicken by hatching the egg, not by smashing it.
    -- Arnold H. Glasow

    If it doesn't produce results, don't do it.

    -- Me

  • For me its less about the quality at present, its just not easily accessible.

    1) Currently only really works for DAW's and not for live. Any hardware to run the full blown rather than Lite is isn't free or cheap.

    2) Its fiddly to use - the problem with open source in general is consistency. I bought a Valeton Gp50 because it played NAM captures. Dead cheap so I was quite excited - not managed to load a single NAM capture so far..

    3) Very limited tweakability with the existing player

    So does the tech have potential? Probably, but its not there yet, requires too much fiddling and the sound is...meh, hardly game changing. I downloaded The Stormblade...I prefer amplitube TBH.

  • For me its less about the quality at present, its just not easily accessible.

    1) Currently only really works for DAW's and not for live. Any hardware to run the full blown rather than Lite is isn't free or cheap.

    2) Its fiddly to use - the problem with open source in general is consistency. I bought a Valeton Gp50 because it played NAM captures. Dead cheap so I was quite excited - not managed to load a single NAM capture so far..

    3) Very limited tweakability with the existing player

    So does the tech have potential? Probably, but its not there yet, requires too much fiddling and the sound is...meh, hardly game changing. I downloaded The Stormblade...I prefer amplitube TBH.

    This is a little bit outdated. Things are moving quickly. Several affordable options now. The sound is as good as captures can be. Best in class. And people can still make captures of badly dialed in amps. Plenty of those too.

    Kemper PowerRack |Kemper Stage| Rivera 4x12 V30 cab | Yamaha DXR10 pair | UA Apollo Twin Duo | Adam A7X | Cubase DAW
    Fender Telecaster 62 re-issue chambered mahogany | Kramer! (1988 or so...) | Gibson Les Paul R7 | Fender Stratocaster HBS-1 Classic Relic Custom Shop | LTD EC-1000 Evertune | 1988 Desert Yellow JEM

  • i know most of you aren't playing clean jazz but I just did this test. Not scientific by any means but enough to tell me it's not for me at this point.

    NAM2 vs Kemper (jazz guitar tone) using tonejunkies '64 vibroverb

    So many folks have been raving about the NAM2 tech and saying that it's a game changer.

    I wanted to see for myself so I downloaded the '64 vibroverb in NAM2 format to compare it to my favorite jazz guitar profile in kemper.

    Not really a scientific result because the captures were recorded at different times, possibly different settings but they are the same capture (in theory) with both techs.

    Since NAM2 doesn't have a reverb, I addeded Audioscape spring reverb plugin to the NAM2 track.

    The NAM2 captures seem to have too much gain so I almost aways turn the gain to zero. It's still slightly distorting. Also, the output is very low and if I turn the output up in NAM2 gateway, it yields digital distortion even though the level indicator does not show clipping.

    Let me know your thoughts. Sorry about the extremely sloppy playing. I could blame my meds but you know how that goes! 😜

    External Content youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

  • This is a little bit outdated. Things are moving quickly. Several affordable options now. The sound is as good as captures can be. Best in class. And people can still make captures of badly dialed in amps. Plenty of those too.

    Such as? Even in TJ's latest vid the players are all $500 or above...

    My point is it's still early days and the tech hasn't settled yet. Of course things are changing quickly..

  • Out of curiosity I've installed Gateway on my Mac and downloaded the freebie from the Silver Jubilee from MattFig and compared it to the same profile in the Kemper pack.

    Soundwise it's hard to tell them apart, honestly. On the feeling side I liked the Kemper better (NAM feels a bit stiffer, but it could well be the difference in latency).

    Anything that would make me want to change? Nope, specially thinking at the HW platform.

    I honestly wouldn't see a reason to add NAM to Kemper

    If something is too complicated, then you need to learn it better

  • Such as? Even in TJ's latest vid the players are all $500 or above...

    My point is it's still early days and the tech hasn't settled yet. Of course things are changing quickly..

    Well, then more affordable than Kemper's cheapest option then :)

    Kemper PowerRack |Kemper Stage| Rivera 4x12 V30 cab | Yamaha DXR10 pair | UA Apollo Twin Duo | Adam A7X | Cubase DAW
    Fender Telecaster 62 re-issue chambered mahogany | Kramer! (1988 or so...) | Gibson Les Paul R7 | Fender Stratocaster HBS-1 Classic Relic Custom Shop | LTD EC-1000 Evertune | 1988 Desert Yellow JEM