KEMPER Kone NEO Speaker vs Celestion F12-X200

  • The Profiler Model referred to in this thread is ...
    ☑️ Profiler Player

    Is the KEMPER Kone NEO Speaker an alternative to the Celestion F12-X200.
    I only want one cabinet for my various modelers.
    Or does the KEMPER Kone NEO only work with Kemper Profilers?

  • According to this Article (LINK), the Kone was based on the Celestion F12-X200: "The Kone 12“ full range speaker which is made by Celestion and exclusively designed for Kemper, is based on its own F12-X200 loudspeaker designed specifically for use with profiling amps and modeling software. The sound variations are controlled and driven by the Profiler's own DSP, using a dedicated algorithm."

    I used the F12-X200 for several years and really liked it (still have one sitting in a box after switching out to a Kone). The Kone imprints were very much worth the switch. The Celestion F12-X200 sounded very good with the profiled cabs in almost all cases.

    If you want to use a speaker with multiple modelers, the Celestion F12-X200 would be a very good choice in my opinion.

  • According to this Article (LINK), the Kone was based on the Celestion F12-X200: "The Kone 12“ full range speaker which is made by Celestion and exclusively designed for Kemper, is based on its own F12-X200 loudspeaker designed specifically for use with profiling amps and modeling software. The sound variations are controlled and driven by the Profiler's own DSP, using a dedicated algorithm."

    I used the F12-X200 for several years and really liked it (still have one sitting in a box after switching out to a Kone). The Kone imprints were very much worth the switch. The Celestion F12-X200 sounded very good with the profiled cabs in almost all cases.

    If you want to use a speaker with multiple modelers, the Celestion F12-X200 would be a very good choice in my opinion.

    I’m not 100% sure but I’m fairly confident that article is wrong. If you look at the back of the Kone in the article you can even see the Celestion code K12K-200 which would line up with a custom version of the K12H-200

  • The Kone has a slightly narrower frequency range compared to the F12-X200. Probably from using a different magnet. The Kone is more guitar focused where the F12-X200 is more of a true FRFR.

    Larry Mar @ Lonegun Studios. Neither one famous yet.

  • The Kone has a slightly narrower frequency range compared to the F12-X200. Probably from using a different magnet. The Kone is more guitar focused where the F12-X200 is more of a true FRFR.

    The difference is way more than magnets Larry. The F12 -X200 is a full range speaker with a crossover and compression driver tweeter. The Kone/K12-200 has a passive "whizzer" cone attached to the same voice coil as the main cone without any crossover network. Totally different beasts.

  • The difference is way more than magnets Larry. The F12 -X200 is a full range speaker with a crossover and compression driver tweeter. The Kone/K12-200 has a passive "whizzer" cone attached to the same voice coil as the main cone without any crossover network. Totally different beasts.

    I'm not disagreeing with you Alan. I just pointed out the basic differences, my friend. :)

    Larry Mar @ Lonegun Studios. Neither one famous yet.